NFTs can really be anything digital (such as drawings, music, or if I may use Sheldon Cooper's thoughts from the sitcom Big Bang Theory, your brain downloaded and turned into an AI), but a lot of the current excitement is around using the tech to sell digital art.
This is where things start getting interesting. If NFTs are all about owning, transferring and trading/transacting in unique items like videos, piece of art, music in digital format, what is the ownership structure and copyright. One can always copy a digital file as many times as you want through the open internet media, including the art that’s included with an NFT. NFTs are designed to give you the ownership of the work, which can’t be copied, although the artist or creator can still retain the copyright and reproduction rights, just like with physical artwork. To put it in terms of understandable tangible physical art collecting, anyone can buy a Hussain or a Van Gogh print, but only one person can own the original.
With the explosive development of decentralized finance, and uptrend in the adoption of NFTS, we have witnessed a phenomenal growth in tokenization of all kinds of assets, including equity, funds, debt, and real estate. It has been successfully applied to digital fantasy artwork, games, collectibles, etc. However, there is a lack of research in utilizing NFT in issues such as Intellectual Property. Applying for a patent and trademark is not only a time-consuming and lengthy process but also costly. NFT has considerable potential in the intellectual property domain. It can promote transparency and liquidity and open the market to innovators who aim to commercialize their inventions efficiently.
No comments:
Post a Comment